Conspiracy Theories Abound on Navy Yard Shooting

Navy Yard Cordoned by Police

If you haven't already heard about the Washington Navy Yard shooting that left a dozen people dead in addition to 1 dead shooting suspect and a number of others injured this morning, then you have now. Even President Obama mentioned it before delivering his State of the Economy speech today. My hopes are that these victims rest in peace and that those injured are able to fully recover from their wounds.

Now, the main stream media is already chastising conspiracy nuts because they allege this to be a false flag operation used to "distract the masses" from Obama's failure with Syria, the Benghazi anniversary, and so on and so forth. I cannot blame the main stream media because many conspiracy theorists tend to rely on the circumstances of a situation and not so much any hard evidence to dispute the official stories.

A recent example of how conspiracy theorists bring this upon themselves is the viral circulation of an anonymously-narrated video claiming that the plane hitting the South Tower on 9/11 was a computer generated imagery (CGI) and not an actual plane when the whole world was honed in on the scene after the first attack on the North Tower. In other amateur videos, the building said to be in the "background" and behind the South Tower is clearly in the foreground, thus invalidating the entire CGI theory.

What does not make sense, however; is a beam of light trained on the shadowed South Tower just prior to the plane's collision. This same beam of light appears unaffected by the collision and continues the same trajectory through the plume of smoke and onto the building to its right as if Staff Sergeant Nantz is in his final battle scene from the film Battle: Los Angeles and aiming a laser designator on the alien's command and control center in order to destroy the system by missile fire.

At any rate, the official story of the Washington Navy Yard comes with a little bit of confusing and perhaps disturbing information, so I ask that you sit down before you read the next line. If you look at the date-time-stamp posted on The Daily Courier's article it is dated Sunday night and indexed into Google as of Sunday night prior to the actual incident occurring early morning Monday. CNN had an article, which has been taken down, about the shooting that has been indexed by Google prior to the shooting also. I might be a crazy fool, but does anybody mind explaining to me how this is chronologically possible?