Wednesday, June 7, 2017
On April 4, 2017, the United States not only broke the news that a sarin gas attack was executed upon a civilian population in Khan Shaykhun, Syria, they immediately knew within minutes that it was the Syrian government and demanded the U.S. government take immediate military action. So, without any form of a international field investigation, President Donald Trump approved of a missile strike on Shayrat Air Base April 7, 2017.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and much of his allies in the eastern hemisphere immediately demanded Trump back off for a formal investigation to take place or an escalation of the situation would be forthcoming in retaliation for the act of war by the United States. President Trump backed off and now 2 months later MIT professor emeritus, Theodore Postol, says the story promoted by the New York Times and Bellingcat were "fraudulent," ergo fake news.
In fact, I reported the violation of International Law by the United States in this blog on April 9, 2017, hinting the United States appeared to have "pre-appointed" roles for the situation, yet the so-called "intelligence" supporting the claim that the Syrian government was the culprit remains under lock-and-key. Postol states, "It seems to me that analysts were ignorant beyond plausibility or they rigged the analysis...To me, this is malpractice on a large scale."
Perhaps when the NYT finds itself banned and in the same boat as the Daily Mail by Wikipedia for lack of "reliability" in sourcing news, they might consider stronger ethics in reporting.
Monday, April 17, 2017
There seems to be a pattern among court systems in the United States. Back in October 2005, long time tax protestor Irwin Schiff was sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Kent Dawson to 12 years in prison for tax evasion and fraud. When Schiff attempted to use the 16th Amendment as his basis for arguing against the Federal income tax, he was given an additional 11 months for contempt. Irwin Schiff passed in October 2015 from cancer at 87 while still in custody.
Today, Cliven Bundy has a case in which the U.S. Bureau of Land Management was awarded a $1.2 million judgment against Bundy and attempted to seize his cattle to recover on their judgment. A standoff ensued in Nevada in which 19 arrests resulted and Bundy's attorneys have attempted to use the First and Second Amendments of the U.S. Constitution as the basis for their actions. Judge Gloria Navarro has ordered the jury not to consider the Constitution as a part of their instruction and they cannot even bring a copy into Hon. Navarro's courtroom. As a result, Bundy's motions have been denied and his case has a received a devastating blow. Of course, Bundy will likely file an appeal.
|(U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro)|
Historically, in Padelford, et al., v. The Alderman of the City of Savannah, et al. (14 Ga. 438), the court ruled, "The Constitution is a compact... [and] no private citizen may have a right of action for breach of contract against the United States because they are not a party to it." Therefore, if a private citizen brings the U.S. Constitution to substantiate their arguments in court, they are trespassing on the property of another. For instance, no citizen in their right mind would bring the mortgage note of their neighbor to argue their own case with their mortgage lender.
Citizens are only afforded the Bill of Rights, not through the Constitution itself, but by the Incorporation Doctrine in which states are granted them in a limited capacity. Citizens must therefore petition their respective states to take up their cause against the United States. If a "right" can be granted at will, it can also be rescinded by the grantor at will.
(Disclaimer: Use of his video for education purposes expressly given to Blake Lynch by David Williams for Matrix Solutions.)
Sunday, April 9, 2017
A sarin gas attack in Syria made international headlines earlier this week as dozens of innocent civilians were killed. Immediately following this attack was a rushed point of blame by American news media against Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad. Assad denies responsibility for this attack while Russia, China and Iran have sided with Syria on the issue. A case of convenient amnesia, however, appears to have befallen Americans and their allies emotionally charged by the incident.
As recent as 2012, Secretary Hillary Clinton approved sending sarin gas weapons from Benghazi, Libya to Syrian rebels (i.e., ISIS/ISIL) who opposed Assad. In fact, this was done on President Obama's watch. In 2013 and 2016, sarin gas was used against civilian populations. Of course, the U.S. blamed Assad, but instead of experts at the U.N. blaming Assad as the culprit, they blamed rebel fighters.
On Friday April 7, 2017, President Vladimir Putin condemned the U.S. attacks against Syria as "an act of war and a violation of International Law." Unfortunately, Putin is correct. China and Russia's call for an international investigation into the incident prompts suspicion on part of the U.S. as to "pre-appointed" roles regarding the gas attack, yet the "intelligence" being used to substantiate their claims is kept under lock and key by the U.S. intelligence community. International Law dictates United Nations approval is required prior to a military strike. When the "UN failed to protect human rights" by taking swift action against Assad, the U.S. launched 59 missiles against a Syrian Air Base on April 6, 2017.
Today, Russia and China garnered support from Iran with promised retaliation against the U.S. armed forces if it does not cease and desist violating International Law with their acts of war against Syria. If the Trump Administration fails to comply with these demands and International Law, he will effectively enter the United States into World War III against Eastern Super Powers.
Friday, August 26, 2016
|(Canadian Prime Minster Trudeau)|
This controversial Bill C-15 titled the Budget Implementation Act was passed in Canadian Parliament and signed by Trudeau earlier this year on March 22, 2016. More specifically, the Act states at Section 2.3:
"An order made under paragraph 39.13(1)(d) gives the Corporation the power to convert, or cause the federal member institution to convert, in whole or in part - by means of a transaction or a series of transactions and in one or more steps - the institution's shares and liabilities that are prescribed by the regulations made under subsection (10) into common shares of that institution or any of its affiliates." (See Section 2.3 - Conversion).The International Monetary Fund ("IMF") recognizes a housing bubble exists in Canada at this time and the average value of homes across Canada is 30% over valued at minimum. The IMF also understands that because it is only a matter of time before the housing bubble bursts preparations need to be made in order to mitigate losses for their member banks around the world. This means the United States as well as others are in line for similar measures!
The only way in which members of the public can prevent their deposits from reaching their national banking institution is to close their account(s). This way, the payer is forced to remit a check in which to be cashed instead of deposited. This might also mean one must look into investing in a safe.
(Canadian Times Reports on Bail-In, 8/11/2016)
Friday, July 15, 2016
|(Civil War Tribute at Veteran Memorial in Santa Clarita, CA.)|
"The failure of the Confederacy to win recognition from foreign countries, and the effective blockade of their coasts by the Federal Navy, doomed the South to failure. When the war ended four years later, the human cost far exceeded what anyone had imagined at its start. The Union endured and the United States emerged stronger from this conflict. The Union lost 364,511 and the Confederacy lost 163,280 for a total of 527,791 Americans who died in the conflict." (See Civil War citation at left.)
In 1782, members of the United States of America and Britain met in Paris, France, to discuss and enter what would become the 1783 Treaty of Paris ("Treaty"). The parties at this meeting were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, Henry Laurens, and John Adams from the United States. From Britain were David Hartley, ESQ., and Chief Negotiator and Merchant for King George, Richard Oswald, of Scotland.
As a result of this meeting in 1782, the Treaty was signed in 1783 by all parties and the Constitution for the People of the United States ("Constitution") came as a result in 1789. This Treaty was multi-fold. It first ended the American Revolutionary War and reconstituted the outstanding debt owed by the British North American Colonies from the French-Indian War to Britain. The Constitution even mentions "No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States." (See Article I, Section 9, Clause 8). The term Esquire originates from England and is provided to licensed attorneys in the United States once they pass the "Bar-rister" exam and are admitted to practice law.
|(U.S. Civil War Cemetery.)|
Navigating back to the Civil War, the Confederate States attempted to secede from the Union and become recognized internationally by foreign states, however, this is in clear violation of the 1783 Treaty and the Constitution. As a result of the attack on Fort Sumter, South Carolina by the Confederates in 1861, over 500,000 soldiers between the Confederates and the Union perished before the war ended in 1865. This means half a million people died fighting for a cause premised on a breach and dishonor of international treatise.
Today, we have several States of the Union having expressed the desire to secede from the Union when the Constitution was created to "create a more perfect Union." Any attempts to secede from the Union will be found to be in violation of the Constitution and the 1783 Treaty. This will be considered an Act of War against England and that of the United States. The only way for people to "secede" out of the jurisdiction of the United States is by the former Right of Exile or what is known today as the Right of Self-Determination.
Monday, April 25, 2016
|(Pres. Obama with King Salman 4/16)|
Nearly two weeks ago, it was revealed publicly that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia threatened the U.S. State Department with massive economic woes if it passed legislation in the U.S. Senate allowing claimants to file suit against the Saudi government for directly and financially supporting members of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. U.S. National Intelligence Director, James Clapp, certifies that he believes the U.S. government will declassify the 28 pages censured from the 9/11 Commission Report and make them public by June 2016.
|(Urban Moving, an alleged Israeli Mossad front seen on 9/11.)|
If this should happen we might see economic volatility as we may have never have seen before in the upcoming months. The $750 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds Saudi threatens to sell off is about the same amount printed off by the U.S. Treasury to bail out various corporations after the 2008 economic meltdown to keep the U.S. economy afloat. Consider the magnitude of consequences that might result from this act with an already tense relationship between the two countries.
What if I also told you that these 28 pages are not even the half of it? Rumor has it that these pages only link Saudi Arabia to 9/11. Many others are asking what about classified information linking Israel to 9/11? What has not been heavily discussed in public forum is that the U.S. government has admitted to possession of classified information about Israeli Mossad agents posing as "art students" while visiting the United States for the sole purpose of "documenting the event" on 9/11. After these Israelis were captured immediately following 9/11, the FBI took custody of several members of Urban Moving, refused to reveal their identities or national origin, and then deported them back to the middle east.
Saturday, April 23, 2016
|(Hawking at Harvard University, 4/16)|
At the turn of the 21st century, Persian physicist Nassim Haramein laid claim to the theory that black holes might be gateways to other points in our universe or alternate universes and that at the very minimum every planet has a black hole at its center and so do galaxies. Therefore, the Sun at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy would be considered a "stargate" to any other point in this or an alternate universe.
Because Haramein was not certified as having a PhD behind his name, his ideas were mostly shrugged off by mainstream science for the perception as being "too radical." This week, world-renowned theoretical physicist Dr. Stephen Hawking publicly announced this same consideration in a speech at Harvard University and now the world of physics is in "shock and awe." Hawking is at least 20 years behind Haramein and this is not the first time either.
|(Haramein filming for The Connected Universe)|
Several years ago, Haramein shared his explorative discoveries by revealing ancient artifacts detailing that the Ancient Mayans acknowledged the presence of extraterrestrial interference in aiding the progression of life on this planet several thousands of years ago from cataclysmic events such as destroying meteors aimed for the destruction of earth (See below). Today, we have Dr. Hawking not only considering the possibilities of extraterrestrial life, he publicly announced a $100 million project in an effort to seek it out.
Without much study into the subject of physics myself, even I can grasp the idea that black holes may exist sub-atomically at the center of the nuclei of each and every atom in the universe, which is also known as singularity. Therefore, when an atom is split such as in the case of an atomic explosion from a bomb, what we are essentially doing is releasing subatomic energy by destroying a tiny black hole. Because black holes are known to bend both light and spacetime, only through the advantage of singularity in black holes will humanity be able to traverse faster than the speed of light between planets, stars, galaxies and universes as we do today between towns, states, countries, and continents.