Monday, April 25, 2016

28 Classified Pages Predicted For Release By June 2016

(Pres. Obama with King Salman 4/16)
Nearly two weeks ago, it was revealed publicly that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia threatened the U.S. State Department with massive economic woes if it passed legislation in the U.S. Senate allowing claimants to file suit against the Saudi government for directly and financially supporting members of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. U.S. National Intelligence Director, James Clapp, certifies that he believes the U.S. government will declassify the 28 pages censured from the 9/11 Commission Report and make them public by June 2016.

(Urban Moving, an alleged Israeli Mossad front seen on 9/11.)
If this should happen we might see economic volatility as we may have never have seen before in the upcoming months. The $750 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds Saudi threatens to sell off is about the same amount printed off by the U.S. Treasury to bail out various corporations after the 2008 economic meltdown to keep the U.S. economy afloat. Consider the magnitude of consequences that might result from this act with an already tense relationship between the two countries.

What if I also told you that these 28 pages are not even the half of it? Rumor has it that these pages only link Saudi Arabia to 9/11. Many others are asking what about classified information linking Israel to 9/11? What has not been heavily discussed in public forum is that the U.S. government has admitted to possession of classified information about Israeli Mossad agents posing as "art students" while visiting the United States for the sole purpose of "documenting the event" on 9/11. After these Israelis were captured immediately following 9/11, the FBI took custody of several members of Urban Moving, refused to reveal their identities or national origin, and then deported them back to the middle east.

Saturday, April 23, 2016

Confirmation Bias at Harvard University

(Hawking at Harvard University, 4/16)
At the turn of the 21st century, Persian physicist Nassim Haramein laid claim to the theory that black holes might be gateways to other points in our universe or alternate universes and that at the very minimum every planet has a black hole at its center and so do galaxies. Therefore, the Sun at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy would be considered a "stargate" to any other point in this or an alternate universe.

Because Haramein was not certified as having a PhD behind his name, his ideas were mostly shrugged off by mainstream science for the perception as being "too radical." This week, world-renowned theoretical physicist Dr. Stephen Hawking publicly announced this same consideration in a speech at Harvard University and now the world of physics is in "shock and awe." Hawking is at least 20 years behind Haramein and this is not the first time either.

(Haramein filming for The Connected Universe)
Several years ago, Haramein shared his explorative discoveries by revealing ancient artifacts detailing that the Ancient Mayans acknowledged the presence of extraterrestrial interference in aiding the progression of life on this planet several thousands of years ago from cataclysmic events such as destroying meteors aimed for the destruction of earth (See below). Today, we have Dr. Hawking not only considering the possibilities of extraterrestrial life, he publicly announced a $100 million project in an effort to seek it out.

Without much study into the subject of physics myself, even I can grasp the idea that black holes may exist sub-atomically at the center of the nuclei of each and every atom in the universe, which is also known as singularity. Therefore, when an atom is split such as in the case of an atomic explosion from a bomb, what we are essentially doing is releasing subatomic energy by destroying a tiny black hole. Because black holes are known to bend both light and spacetime, only through the advantage of singularity in black holes will humanity be able to traverse faster than the speed of light between planets, stars, galaxies and universes as we do today between towns, states, countries, and continents.

Saturday, April 16, 2016

Saudi Arabia Threatens U.S. State Department with Financial Collapse if 9/11 Bill Passes in Senate

(President Obama walking with members of Saudi Arabia)
As of this week, it can be said that tensions between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United States have never been higher. The reason for this is because of Senate Bills S.1471 and S.2040 both sponsored in bipartisan by members of U.S. Congress. If S.2040 passes in the US Senate, members of Congress would essentially publish culpable facts that Saudi Arabia knowingly and directly financed hijackers of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The Kingdom has gone so far as to threaten that if this bill passes, they will sell off nearly $750 billion in U.S. Treasury notes.

9/11 Conspiracy Theorists, or "Truthers" as they are affectionately called, have long held that the US Government has been somehow directly or indirectly involved in a conspiracy regarding the events of that day. In fact, the Iraq War was reported internationally as the most hotly protested war in history. Should these 28 currently classified pages be declassified by the Senate Bill, it could definitively confirm that the George Bush Jr. Presidential Administration classified these pages during the days the same administration waged war on both Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003) in a deliberate effort to protect their allied relationship with Saudi Arabia.

(Former President Bush with member of Saudi Arabia)
The United States would also be found culpable in the International Criminal Court for active participation in a conspiracy of committing mass murder on American soil, international war crimes and crimes against humanity all the while knowing full well alternative parties were indeed involved. If this were to occur, both the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United States could lose sovereign immunities protecting them from prosecution, be prosecuted both civilly and criminally, and be forced to pay mass amounts of damages and war reparations akin to Germany post-World War 1. It would ultimately be the end of the United States as we know it. It would be no more.

As for the death of Usama bin Laden, the Barack Obama Presidential Administration would also be directly implicated in a crime of assassination after having direct access to classified documents exonerating Bin Laden of any wrongdoing on 9/11. Recent pressures from the Saudi Government have convinced President Obama to schedule a visit to the Kingdom next week. With threats of financial retaliation sounding off, it would appear there might be some merit to the rumor.

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Climate Change You Never Heard Before

The heated political debate on climate change has continued for decades. Some say it is happening and explain it away that everyday people are largely contributing to it. Others say the global data on worldwide temperatures does not reflect large scale climate change. The real problem is that most people are seeing only one side of the coin and no newspaper article or evening news is going to say anything further about it in the hopes that you subscribe to its radicalized columns. I'm here to tell you exactly what is happening and any scientific expert on this subject anywhere on this planet can put it up to scrutiny, but they cannot scientifically refute what I am about to tell you.

I once heard U.S. Navy Admiral Richard E. Byrd say that the North Pole has thinned ice with an abyss of about 10,000 feet deep whereas the South Pole is a plateau about 10,000 feet high. That alone begs the question "why?" In the 1940's, the United States began to heavily experiment in nuclear technologies and even dropped atomic bombs on Japan in 1945 killing approximately 150,000 people in an instant and another 100,000 more so from radiation poisoning thereafter. Upon a nuclear detonation, the dead matter resulting from the explosive reaction creates positively charged carbon ions and what magnetic pole must positively charged ions attract to? The negative North Pole. This is why the ice caps at the North Pole are receding heavily - heat resistance.

On the other hand, the water vapor from these nuclear explosions are negatively charged and attract to the positive South Pole. With the North Pole losing mass from heat resistance, the South Pole is receiving a tremendous amount of increase per-day from water-turned-ice, which is tilting the planet further and further off of its axis over time. It was 16-degrees off of its axis in the 1950's and was reported to be at least 23.5-degrees off as of a decade ago. Common sense will tell you that this tilt results from nuclear explosions alone thus causing global climate conditions to change at an increased rate no automobile or factory emissions can compete with.

The wide-spread demand for clean and renewable energy vehicles has been around for least the last 100 years and is only recently becoming more prevalent because of big business interests. Now we have 150 of the world's leaders communing near Paris, France at a Climate Change Conference for the next two weeks in an attempt to determine the best strategic course of action. My hopes are that they do not nickel and dime the worldwide population in "carbon taxes" because this will be the furthest from a real world solution to a problem they created and control themselves.

The only way in which to allow the planet to begin its recovery is to simply stop nuclear testing and detonations worldwide, altogether. While nuclear activity is highly regulated, our national governments and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have the power to stop these destructive forces just as they have had the power to conform to them since World War II.

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Tax Protestor Irwin Schiff and the IRS

Irwin Schiff passed away in prison last week October 16 upon succumbing to cancer. The reason he was in prison in the first place was because he fought the Internal Revenue Service in the courts since the 1970's and this was not the first time he served a sentence in the prison system for the same reason. His most recent term was simply based on the fact that he trespassed on the U.S. constitution and we will get to that.

Before Mr. Schiff passed away after serving 10 of his 13+ year term, his son Peter Schiff made every attempt for a "compassionate release" so that Irwin could live out the rest of his days with his family. The courts turned every petition down and rightfully so. Irwin did not learn from his mistakes stemming from the 1970's. He continued on the path he was on and refused to comprehend what his mistakes were. The courts extend grace where grace is due and Irwin abused that grace not once, not twice, but several times and over several decades.

Now going back to Irwin's trespass on the U.S. constitution. After my return from Iraq in 2009, I committed myself to understanding government. Like a philosopher believes knowledge is about as critical to life as the air one breathes, so too did I believe the thorough understanding of the historical rabbit hole of government was at least "a key" to freedom. I stumbled upon Irwin's material and saw what he was trying to do. Fascinated, I performed my due diligence on his track record and it quickly became obvious why he ended up back in prison. The "patriots" cried foul, but it was clear why it happened.

Irwin argued in court that the Sixteenth Amendment of the U.S. constitution did not apply to him. While many people might argue this amendment was never properly ratified, silent acquiescence is a form of consent. Today, if you receive a summons to appear in court and you do not appear after receiving proper notification, what happens? The court could enter default against you for your failure to respond and that quickly becomes your problem. That would mean the Sixteenth Amendment did legally pass by the consent of the majority of the states, as no response objecting to the proposed amendment was ever received or objections were not received in time.

"No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it."

If you are not a party to a contract, you do not have a claim of right on that contract and that is exactly where Irwin went wrong. He trespassed on the U.S. constitution and it is partially why he was given such a hefty prison sentence aside from having repeatedly protested taxes previously. Think of someone practicing law without a license. When they practice law and they are not licensed (permitted) by the Bar to practice, they trespass (infringe) on the Bar's copyright to conduct business as a lawyer. It really is as simple as that, it is unfair and unacceptable.

Thursday, September 10, 2015

British Citizens Make Noise, But No Sense

In recent news, a petition in the United Kingdom with the goal of obtaining 100,000 signatures in order for the UK Government to consider apprehending Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu succeeded in hitting its target. The British Government response hit the nail squarely on the head:

"Under UK and international law, visiting heads of foreign governments, such as Prime Minister Netanyahu, have immunity from legal process, and cannot be arrested or detained."

The painful lesson is that a minister with diplomatic character is immune from prosecution in a host nation. Instead, what should have been done is that the International Courts should have been petitioned  for a case against the State of Israel and Israel's Prime Minister. This would have at least assured the International Courts would review the matter before determination whether they would hear the matter by the parties.

The Law of Nations has been around since the 18th century and was used to construct the United States Constitution. Why then is it so hard for people to understand that a law exists governing nations and their conduct in the course of business such as that of disputes? This is because common people do not understand law, they do not understand legal protocol, and they do not understand the mechanics of the rules governing how to petition the appropriate venue. Citizens are required to petition the UK Government to take up their cause in order to petition the International Courts. Better luck next time?

Friday, July 24, 2015

Israel Violating International Law

(Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu)
This article is not designed to upset proponents of the State of Israel, but it will. Proponents of Israel have lent longstanding support to the State because of the context in which it is considered to be "God's chosen," but that is something of a completely different discussion and a matter of religious debate. In terms of this new up-and-coming Nuclear Arms Treaty between 6 of the world's prominent nations and Iran, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ("Bibi") is hotly protesting this agreement in violation of International Law as an "interfering State."

Historically speaking, the United States and Israel have been some of the greatest allies the world has ever seen since post-World War II. Since that time, however; Israel has had a number of conflicts in the international community between Saudi Arabia, Palestine, and Iran. More recently, the United Nations has accused Israel of violating the Geneva Conventions and committing International Human Rights violations in the wake of armed conflict with Palestinians in Gaza while "confining" the People of Gaza into a fixed strip of land.

(U.S. and Iran meet in Vienna 2015)
In terms of the Nuclear Arms Treaty designed to disarm established nations, Israel has become extremely vocal in its protest over the current nuclear arms deal with Iran. First, Israel has all but refused to become a party to this international treaty at any time. Second, Israel has also violated several international agreements, rights, duties, conventions and resolutions as identified by the United Nations. There is not one State on this planet who has not committed any violations of international agreements and law. Second, Israel is blatantly violating International Law with its outcry against the Treaty with Iran.

"States have the duty to co-operate with one another, irrespective of the differences in their political, economic and social systems, in the various spheres of international relations, in order to maintain international peace and security and to promote international economic stability and progress, the general welfare of nations and international co-operation free from discrimination based on such differences."
This indicates that any member of the United Nations who does not promote international peace and tranquility with other members and non-members is guilty of violating the Charter of the United Nations. This would include both Israel and Iran in which both can be subject to international sanctions, whether financial and/or political.