![]() |
(Illustration of Revolutionary War) |
Isn't it quite obvious? We are at war. How long have we been at war? Since before the United States came about in 1789. The colonies fought in the French-Indian Conflict and the Revolutionary Conflict. Both began and ended prior to the end of the 18th century. According to a former show of the West Wing, U.S. Navy Admiral and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff expresses his confusion about knowing the difference between "peacetime" and "wartime." This confusion is "widespread."
The United States has become involved in ever major conflict in the world since the 18th century and it has a record to prove it. What most people in the United States do not understand is that the Peace Treaty of Paris 1783 confirmed the war debts from the French-Indian Conflict owed by the colonies to the Britannic Crown. Because this debt has never been repaid and continues to expand in the form of the Public Debt, U.S. citizens have always been subject to the Crown. "Patriots" love to question the debt citing "The debt is a fraud" and "it does not truly exist." How about reading § 4 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the People of the United States?
"The validity of the public debt of the United States… shall not be questioned."
Now that we have established that the public debt is warranted, why do I bring debts up? The first reason is that not only did we start the public debt with war, but it has evolved ferociously because of it ever since. The second reason is that war is extremely profitable and perhaps the most profitable "industry" to do business in on this planet. War generates so much profit that the United States has used this industry in order to propagate its perpetuity in order to pay just the interest on its war debts. The option is that we go to war or the United State declares itself insolvent, benefits cease, assets are frozen and seized, banks no longer loan to private industry, and Martial Law goes into full effect. Choices...
![]() |
(Frontline of Modern-Day War) |
Ever wonder what the relationship has been between the United States and Britain? There is correspondence between English David Hartley, Esq. and Secretariat Charles Fox. A "precedence to the Crowned Head" exists where the "priority or equality of rank" has never come under dispute. The President (Presiding Head) of the United States has almost always been related to Britannic Royalty where a treaty between the United States and the Crown prevent the Head of the United States from ever having title as a king. Patrick Henry once credited the Constitution for the People of the United States as having granted the President of the United States with the "powers of a king" and it is exactly why he was anti-Federalist. Either America has liberty or it has a union and this has long since been decided.
To conclude this article, page 2 of the Law of War Deskbook from the International and Operational Law Department illustrates that in times of war, the U.N. Charter and the Courts will remain in effect and "AD-MINISTER-ED" under "ADMIRAL-TY" / "MARI-TIME" Law, which means that the Courts are run under U.S. military jurisdiction until the realization of "peacetime" under International Law. Under the Law of the Peace, there are no governing bodies because societies self-govern. So, until the U.N. Charter no longer requires membership and the Courts of the United States are no longer arbitrating cases under the U.S. Army, the United States will remain "at war" as the "world's police."
No comments:
Post a Comment