Within the last couple of weeks we have heard that U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, announced a $147 million fund to aid in humanitarian efforts in Hamas-led Gaza. This did not sit well with devout Christians, but what is even more puzzling is why would the U.S. send funds to an extension of a country it does not want to become sovereign?
Clinton had no structural plan as to how to enforce the "humanitarian aid" without it being used for alternative purposes since Hamas is another "terrorist group" because they fight against the Israeli government. What might completely astound people now is that the Obama Administration is intent on funding Palestine with another $495 million in government funds. Why would they do this after being 1 of 9 countries at the United Nations to deny them statehood recognition because Israel did? So that "they can precipitate the outcome they are looking for."
In essence, what we are seeing here is that although the United States government expressly denounces the idea of Palestine and Gaza having any form of sovereignty, they will send $650 million of taxpayer money in aid to their government's with little oversight. Sounds like a great plan! What do you think?
after WWII funds have continued to be sent to Israel and many Jewish victims/family members to this day.
ReplyDeleteI see this as the very same type of action as the Palestines have been victimized themself.
I am not saying any of it is right but I do understand.
IMO the monetary system should be banished.
The monetary system of the United States is that of the Bretton-Woods agreement. It would be a violation of international treaty (thus law) to allow another system of trade and payment to compete with the current system. It is considered a declaration of war on the current system.
ReplyDelete