Missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370

(Malaysian Airliner)

On 24 March 2014, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak concluded publicly that Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370/MAS370 "ended in South Indian Ocean." What perks a lot of suspicion about this conclusion is that the Malaysian government made this conclusion based off of "new" satellite capabilities with support from London, ENG company INMARSAT (International Maritime Satellite Organization). Harbinger Capital, formerly Zapata Corporation, owns a controlling stake in INMARSAT. Guess who co-founded the Zapata Corporation? Former President George H.W. Bush, the same guy who flatly denies being the same George Bush affiliated with the Central Intelligence Agency "at the time" the late President John Fitzgerald Kenny was assassinated in Dallas, Texas.

Now we have a solid link between the missing MH370 and the Central Intelligence Agency. This means whatever stories we are hearing from the "boob tube" no longer hold water (no pun intended). Why? If you give this scenario even a little critical thought, we are being belt fed crap. No, it does not stop there. The official conclusion is that the plane crashed in waters with low visibility because some satellite data by a CIA-affiliated company in London says that a small, white blob in the middle of the sea serves as its "proof." Very interesting. When was the last time an official conclusion was made without thorough investigation into the matter? WMD's in Iraq? Nuclear weaponry in Iran? The list is endless.

(INMARSAT Satellite Imagery)

Perhaps the most damning of all evidence coming out of this story is delivered out of the phone of Philip Woods, a former passenger of MH370 who served as an expatriate Technical Storage Executive in Malaysia for IBM. This guy somehow managed to post a dark photo on the Internet WITH Exif data. Exif data is the same data our phones use when mapping out directions or take photos and post them to Facebook with our location services enabled. It is simply impossible to dispute Exif data since computers in satellites and phone towers alone process the information. The Exif data from the photo taken is dated the third week of March and reflects that the photo was taken aboard the Chago island of Diego Garcia, a U.S. military base in British-owned territory. With the right programs, anybody can find out the exact geographical location of where a photo was taken via "geo-tracking" or "geo-caching" if location services are active on the user's phone. This does not preclude the idea that someone with nothing else better to do put out information to throw people off from finding some "truth" themselves. Indeed, this might be the case, however; when Exif data is detailed in an image relay, disputing it takes on a whole new level of complicated.

The Exif data reflects:
-7.316197 N
72.426544 E

…maybe this can be considered the "South Indian Ocean"? You decide.

("Geo-Tracking" Capabilities)

Update 12 April 2014:

U.K. Daily News reveals government deniability alludes to coverups.