Saturday, January 25, 2014

Death of Loretta Fuddy

(Loretta Fuddy)
Going into this, I must make it clear that I am not a registered voter in any jurisdiction within the United States nor do I entertain much in the way of political discussion. Although I might hold interest in the subjects of government and political science, I do not care for political bureaucracy nor the rhetoric typically found in tandem with it. My goal is simply creation and resolve. That said, because my son's medical condition is that of cardiac arrhythmia in which nearly turned fatal in 2012, I have been asked for my opinion on this matter. This is, in no way, a target on President Obama's administration although this might seem overly coincidental given Loretta's role with concern to his birth certificate; this is directed towards the investigation of her death only.

First, the Maui Police announced that Loretta Fuddy's autopsy report indicates "cardiac arrhythmia-induced by stress." Now, we are not talking about a stroke or a heart attack induced by stress. We are talking about arrhythmia. Cardiac arrhythmia is not induced by stress nor does it occur like a stroke or heart attack would. In all of the cases I am personally familiar with, cardiac arrhythmia is a condition patients are born with and it never acts up in a state of anxiety. When it does act up, patients are either found completely relaxed and if the patient is engaged in activity, they might simply tire out faster than others. Since Loretta's brother points out that Loretta had never had any heart conditions or illnesses pre-existing to this accident, her death does not fit with cardiac arrhythmia.

(Loretta with other passengers)
Second, if this was "stress-induced" why did all of the other survivors report her as being completely calm during the entire ordeal? The pilot did not just nose dive into the sea; he hovered over the bed of water until the plane stopped on the water upright and all living passengers swam calmly to shore. What must be said here is that either the coroner who performed the autopsy is completely incompetent or there is a coverup somewhere in the chain of command in government. Either way, the conclusion of the autopsy is in error and incomplete.


No comments:

Post a Comment