The "New" 9/11 Connection

(WTC 1 & 2 Attacked on  September 11, 2001)

The topic of 9/11 is one of the most "beaten horses" of the 21st century. Why is it one of those topics that "conspiracy theorists" just cannot shed from conversation? Why must they bring it up every anniversary of 9/11 or even when a mass shooting breaks out somewhere in the United States? Could it be the likes of some of our top Generals in the United States military or multiple U.S. Congressmen doubting the official story? How about the 500+ pages of omitted eyewitness testimonies or President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard Cheney invoking "executive privilege" so that they wouldn't have to appear at the 9/11 Commission hearings? What is for certain is that two U.S. Congressmen from the East Coast of the United States are joining in a bipartisan effort to declassify some redacted 9/11 documents.

What does "redact" mean? "To obscure or remove from a document prior to release or publication." To date, there are 28 redacted pages from the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry (JICI) that have never seen the "light of day" in regards to 9/11. What makes it even more interesting is that 46 U.S. Senators wrote a signed demand letter to President George W. Bush urging that he declassify the documents as it sends the "wrong message" to the American people to classify it and that the American people have a right to know the information in these 28 pages. The 46 Senators are separate from the 9/11 panel of commissioners who fought the White House throughout the entire investigation. More than half of them feel they were "set up to fail" with little funding and little time to perform a thorough investigation amid the bureaucracy from the White House. U.S. Senator Thomas Daschle (D-South Dakota) is on record as reporting that Cheney submitted a request specifically to him not to investigate 9/11. This report remains undisputed by the former Bush Administration.

(Saudi Arabian Royalty)

So, what does all of this mean? It simply means that Americans do not know the full story and we wonder why so many "conspiracy theories" are floating around. We went to war in Afghanistan based on what the Bush Administration and media told us -  not because of any investigation. If it is true that the 28 pages both refers to a relationship between the Bush Administration and Saudi Royalty, and a relationship between Saudi Royalty and the 9/11 hijackers, the United States and Saudi Arabia could very well be looking at paying some serious war reparations to Afghanistan just as Germany has experienced after WWI for over 90 years because we "condemned Afghanistan to hell" in armed conflict without a thorough and completed investigation of 9/11. Out of this, we will have nobody else to "thank" (or blame), but ourselves. As for the Bush Administration - they have immunities - citizens do not. We think we are on the verge of a total U.S. economic collapse now? War reparations will be "that straw" that breaks the camels back for generations to come.

According to a study done by psychologists from the University of Kent in the United Kingdom, conspiracy theorists are "sane" whereas "government dupes" are "crazy" and "hostile." Rolling Stone apologized to conspiracy theorists for being "right" in having the basic premise of a world operating as a "rigged game." Jimmy Kimmel goes onto add that the "tin-foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists were proven right" as the leaked documents by Edward Snowden of the National Security Agency (NSA) reveal that the agency tracks over 5 billion records per-day, can pinpoint any cell phone location anywhere in the world, and map the personal relationships of the person using it.

What are the morals to this story? First, always question the validity of a story. Second, never conclude a story, whether it is told by an official or a "paranoid conspiracy theorist." This requires one to always perform ones own due diligence before arriving at a conclusion, let alone rendering ones own opinion. Finally, to preclude any side of a story before arriving at a conclusion predisposes one to an automatic bias, newfound ignorance, and thus makes us, by definition, stupid.