Creating A New System

(Illustration of "The Matrix" Code)

It is not uncommon for us to think in terms of our "Rights." These are argued every day in Courts all across the world. What we must understand very well, however; are what "Rights" we do and do not have. This article is not for the "faint of heart" as it will demonstrate a hugely common misconception about constitutions, contracts and thus, Rights. If what I am about to tell you offends ("of-fence"/"fencing"/"wielding the sword") you in any way, you might also appreciate that others have come before you and experienced an unexpected semblance of "cognitive dissonance" as well. Fret not as you are not alone!

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." -- R. Buckminster Fuller

Most people will tell you that "the system" is inherently irreparable and corrupt. This is true. If it were not, why else would the definition of "insanity" be defined on the very first page in the very first section of the first United States Code (U.S.C.)? The creators of "the system" understand that because we "put up with" so much nonsense and "collude" in the support for war in violation of international law, because we send our troops overseas under the banner of "liberation" yet pillage and rape the innocent and call them "collateral," every international tribunal has convened and convicted the former presidential leadership under Bush Jr. and key members of his administration for international war crimes and crimes against humanity. This, however; does not have any affect on Bush Jr. or his key members as they have immunities from prosecution here in the United States whereas the international tribunals only have judicial enforcement in the jurisdictions where they convene.

Do you remember what happened to "tax protestor," Mr. Irwin Schiff? He advocated and sold anti-individual income tax material. When he appeared in front of Federal Judge Kent J. Dawson, Mr. Schiff brought up the 16th Amendment to the Constitution for the People of the United States as his argument in which Judge Dawson found completely "irrelevant." Why was the U.S. constitution irrelevant in a Court-of-Law for a tax argument? Mr. Schiff, who is now serving out 13 years in prison for over a decade of tax evasion, is simply not a party to the private compact commonly known as the U.S. constitution. The constitution is a a private agreement - a "guide" if you will. Since the Courts are purposed to hear civil conflicts in accordance with private agreements, Mr. Schiff had no valid argument, whatsoever. Think of trying to fight the foreclosure of our homes with our neighbor's mortgage agreement. Will that work in our case against a lender's demurrer (objection)? No!

So, if none of us are a party to the U.S. constitution, where does that put us? We are simply citizens - subjects. We are bonded subjects (slaves) to all U.S. Law, however; draconian we feel that they might be. Our responsibilities are in paying the debt as outlined in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and for the fact that we have been in a perpetual "State of Emergency" since at least the American Civil War, we have the Lieber Code's 100 General Orders (Martial Law). We are "slaves" just as Morpheus told Neo in The Matrix. What is the difference between the nation-state where its members enjoy "perfect liberty and freedom," and that of a citizen? A peace treaty, variation by existing agreement, and political status ("state-us").

"The social pact (agreement)…[creates] equality by covenant and right." -- Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract

So, where does this leave us? This leaves us with one exclusive and infallible solution to the entire socio-political problem we face as our reality right now, today. That solution is to create a new and sustainable society "at peace" with what exists just as Mr. Fuller asserted. This does not include changing the United States and "reclaiming" the U.S. constitution. The only people who can legally vary how the United States operates are the Posterity of the "Founders." If they do not want to change anything, nobody else has a Right to change it because nobody else signed the agreement nor are they direct descendants to its Founders. What does this mean for us? As the popular expression goes, "mind our own business." Why? Because that is what the world is - a business - and if we are not a party to the creation of an idea and its enterprise, take to our own affairs…in "good faith," of course.